Abstract
Veterans benefits are a creature of statute. As such, nearly every veterans benefits issue presented to the courts for resolution involves the interpretation of a statute, regulation, or sub-regulatory authority. Although veterans law has been subject to judicial review for over twenty-five years, the courts still have yet to develop a coherent doctrine regarding when to resolve ambiguity in favor of the veteran versus when to defer to the interpretations of the Department of Veterans Affairs. This Article explores three possible approaches to developing a coherent vision of how veteran friendliness and agency deference can coexist and provide more predictability in how to interpret veterans benefits laws.
Recommended Citation
Ridgway, James D.
(2014)
"Toward a Less Adversarial Relationship Between Chevron and Gardner,"
University of Massachusetts Law Review: Vol. 9:
Iss.
2, Article 7.
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.umassd.edu/umlr/vol9/iss2/7