Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2001
Abstract
Marshall thought that the solution to emancipation and the end to slavery were to be nationally funded. He considered slavery a national problem, not a state problem, as most of his fellow Virginians insisted. In this he differed from most southerners who argued that slave matters were state matters and that the nation could involve itself in the institution of slavery only by strictly adhering to the role assigned to it by the Constitution under the three fifths clause and the fugitive slave clause.
Recommended Citation
Frances Howell Rudko, Pause at the Rubicon, John Marshall and Emancipation: Reparations in the Early National Period?, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 75 (2001).
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Remedies Commons
Comments
Originally published by The John Marshall Law Review in 2001.